Downsizing Newspapers and Pretending to Improve Quality

Executive management at the Allentown Morning CallGo to any journalism conference, and you'll see a lot
recently laid off more than two dozen persons fromof hand-wringing. Reporters and editors are whining
its newsroom, most of them veteran reportersabout how bad it is. They rightly blame owners and
drawing higher salaries. Management plans to cutpublishers. But, they also blame readers for accepting
35-40 positions, according to a letter sent byabbreviated news drops from TV and myriad cable
publisher Timothy Johnson. The cuts are aboutnetworks. They whine about the Blogosphere and
one-fourth of the news staff. The remainingInternet domination. They complain about the short
reporters are being told to write more stories underattention span of their readers. It's this and it's that.
the same deadline constraints. Coverage of localAnd so, with the help of $500 an hour consultants
meetings has been put into secondary importance;who eruditely harrumph their grandeur of divine
bureaus have been combined. The Morning Call is notguesses, they make cosmetic changes. They follow
alone.the 24/7 cable networks and increase entertainment
About 85 percent of all dailies with more thanand gossip. They give us more syrupy "feel good"
100,000 circulation, and about half of all dailies withnews. They say they want to be "relevant." Editors
circulations under 100,000, have cut the number ofat the Morning Call, like many newspapers, are placing
reporters and editors, according to a surveylight features and how-to columns higher than hard
conducted by the Pew Research Center for thenews. Some changes improve the product, most are
People and the Press. During the first half of thisband-aids. A decade ago, the American Society of
year, newspapers laid off or froze more than 6,500Newspaper Editors published a study that revealed
news positions. This was the biggest loss in threeAmericans wanted less, not more sensationalism,
decades, according to the American Society ofgossip, and celebrity news. Apparently, no one was
Newspaper Editors.listening to the people.
With the layoffs, news quality has suffered. AThe system is broken, and it's the owners' fault.
newsroom filled with younger reporters-they aren'tThey have already "maximized profits" by low
paid as much as the senior reporters who weresalaries and minimal benefits, giving veteran reporters
terminated or laid off-leaves a newspaper vulnerable"involuntary terminations," significantly reduced
to a newsroom with less knowledge of theemployee education programs, cut the number of
community and how to gather, report, and writepages, reduced the page size, and increased the use
news. Almost no newspapers have proofreaders.of material provided by syndicates rather than local
About 40 percent of all newspapers report theynews staff. These latest cuts are deep into the
have fewer copyeditors today than just two yearsmuscle. Owners of the Morning Call, like owners at
ago. No proofreaders means more typos. Fewerhundreds of other newspapers, apparently believe
copyeditors means sloppier copy, more factual error,that reducing quality improves profits. The owners of
and a lot more stories that are incomplete.the newspaper industry need a course in Basic
During the past few years, newspaper ownersJournalism 101.
demanded and were getting at 20-40 percent profit,- A quality news product will increase circulation.
among the highest for any industry-and that includes- Increased circulation will bring more advertising.
Big Oil. With newsrooms and the news product- More advertising brings better profits and allows
already lean, the owners kept taking and taking.even more news quality.
And now there's an economic recession. Subscribers- Cutting reporters, benefits, employee training, and
are questioning their annual $150-250 investments.news coverage is not the way to save newspapers.
Businesses are folding, and the ones remaining areWANDERINGS, with Walter Brasch
reducing newspaper advertising budgets.Aug.