Celebrity Appearances and Natural Disasters

You might call me cynical, but have you noticed thatback almost as long as people do, suggesting the
natural disasters have a similar effect on celebrities aspublic were charitable before celebrities. Equally,
sweets do on children? They can't get enough ofthough, you might argue that celebrities publicly
them. The catastrophe has barely hit the front pagesupporting charity go back a long way. If you believe
before they're on TV taking part in telethons andthe Bible, Jesus was famous and charitable. Although,
charity singles. The recent Haiti earthquake is a classicas far as I can tell He was charitable to encourage
example. Don't misunderstand me, I do not write tocharity, rather than charitable to improve His public
detract from the horror of recent events in Haiti,profile.
from the pain and suffering felt by victims andPerhaps it's more accurate to conclude that there is
survivors alike. I merely wish to reflect on howsome sort of cycle here. The public inherently
celebrity culture went from invading our televisions tobelieves charity to be a good thing, so celebrities
influencing that most basic element of humanwishing to boost their profile help charity. Their
kindnesses: charity.support of charity in the media in turn encourages
People, rightly, believe charity to be a good thing.charity amongst the public, completing the cycle. It's
People also believe celebrities seen to be helpinglike the opposite of a vicious circle: a pleasant circle?
charities are good people. But which happened first?People are often cynical about celebrities and
Do people believe charity is worthwhile because theircharities. But it's important to recognise the role they
idols (who as idols must be fundamentally good) helpcan play. Their high profile makes them influential,
charities? Or do celebrities (desperate to be seen asallowing obscure causes to become more mainstream
good people in the eyes of the public) help charitiesand improving attendance at charity events through
because the public first believed charity to be a goodpersonal appearances. More and more charity event
thing? A little deep, but something to considerplanners are booking celebrity appearances to boost
nonetheless.their fundraising. You might still be cynical, but it's not
I hate indecision and sitting on the fence. But I'd havethat bad. If celebrity appearances for charity are
to say it's somewhere in between. I can't tell youwhat it takes to keep the 'desirable circle' complete,
when charity was 'invented.' But, since giving andthen surely it's worth letting them boost their ego
caring are fundamentally human, I'd guess it goesonce in a while? Go on, it's for a good cause.