Celebrities As Role Models?

In today's world of 24/7 media young children areEveryday both children and adults are bombarded
constantly exposed to images of their favourite popwith images of their favourite stars and it is perfectly
stars or film stars. The age that children becomenatural that they should want to emulate them by
immersed in the world of media is also gettingdressing and acting in a similar way. However, if this
younger as a result of the advances in mediaemulation results in negative behaviour then this is
technology. Young children are still as impressionablewhen alarm bells start to ring. If we get to a stage
as ever, so does this mean that celebrities shouldthat we are looking to celebrities to show us how
control their behaviour in order to becomenot to behave rather than how we ought to behave
appropriate role models for their fans?then it is time to reconsider how we view celebrities.
Firstly, celebrities are absolutely aware of theOf course it is natural to be more concerned with the
influence that they have over us normal people andeffect of our celebrity saturated world on children
more importantly over young children. It would beand young people than adults; after all younger
impossible to ignore the media hype that surroundspeople are more impressionable. But are we giving
most celebrities. Does this mean that celebrities haveour children enough credit? Children are often cleverer
a responsibility to present themselves in a certainand more perceptive than we think they are. People
way? To a certain extent this is true as idolisation ishave always grown up with celebrities but there has
something that naturally comes with the job as anever been as much concern about their influence as
by-product of being famous. However, it is also truethere is today. So what has changed? It is true to
that most film stars did not decide to take up actingsay that our society is extremely media saturated so
in order to mould the view of the public and they areperhaps it is more that we are aware of celebrity
of course entitled to privacy.rather than celebs having a greater influence on the
After all, celebrities are normal people who arepublic.
talented and have been lucky enough to be put inWhatever the reason, you cannot get away from
the spotlight. They will make mistakes and should notthe fact that celebs do have a certain amount of
be chastised for doing so as it is natural humaninfluence over the public, be it the way we dress, our
behaviour. What is not natural is that these mistakesaspirations or the way we behave. But it is not
are then played out for the whole world to see. Thiscorrect to assume that all celebrity influence is
is not to say that we should feel sorry for thesenegative. There are some celebs who present
celebs for being in the limelight, rather that theythemselves well and do good deeds like giving money
should learn to exert the certain amount of controlto charity. There are some celebrities who shy away
that they do have to make sure that they are notfrom the limelight preferring to get on with their job.
setting a bad example to their young fans. We can allAll we can ask from people in the spotlight is to try
understand that there are certain things that aand live their lives as positive role models as best
celebrity cannot control but they can control whatthey can.
they wear or more importantly what they are notIf you or someone close to you has a favourite
wearing, (think Britney's knickerless scandal) and whatcelebrity that they idolise then have a browse on
they are pictured doing precisely by not doing it. It isGenuine Memorabilia's online catalogue of signed
not a good message to young children to see theirmemorabilia. There's something for everyone in their
favourite celeb falling out of a club at 3am dressed incatalogue of over 6,000 pieces. Visit Genuine
a skimpy outfit.Memorabilia today.